QRP https://www.theladderline.com/ en QRP 40 meter CW transceiver https://www.theladderline.com/qrp-40-meter-cw-transceiver <span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden">QRP 40 meter CW transceiver</span> <div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p> I finally got my act together and built a transceiver. It's for 40 meters <span>CW</span> and has about 4 watts output. Some of the details may be of interest to other <span>homebrew</span> experimenters.</p> <!--break--><p> Use the links below or over on the right to navigate through the article.</p> </div> <span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"><span lang="" about="/user/3" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Ross</span></span> <span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden">Sat, 10/30/2010 - 23:04</span> <section class="field field--name-comment field--type-comment field--label-hidden comment-wrapper"> </section> <div class="field field--name-tags1 field--type-entity-reference field--label-above"> <div class="field__label">Tags</div> <div class="field__items"> <div class="field__item"><a href="/taxonomy/term/5" hreflang="en">CW</a></div> <div class="field__item"><a href="/taxonomy/term/4" hreflang="en">QRP</a></div> </div> </div> Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:04:04 +0000 Ross 34 at https://www.theladderline.com QRP 80 meter CW transmitter https://www.theladderline.com/node/20 <span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden">QRP 80 meter CW transmitter</span> <div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p> One of my motivations for building and <a href="/dds-60">Arduino controlled DDS-60</a> was to use it as the VFO for a QRP transmitter. I have had success with this by using the RF stages of the Universal QRP Transmitter Mk-II by Wes Hayward <a href="http://w7zoi.net" target="_blank">W7ZOI</a> as described in QST April 2006. <a href="http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/0604028.pdf" target="_blank">Click here</a> to download the article for free from the ARRL.</p> <p> I got an 80 meter version going first using the crystal controlled oscillator before I had the DDS. I bought the "<a href="http://www.kangaus.com/uqrp_tx.htm" target="_blank">bag of parts</a>" from Kanga US. That was an easy way to get started although I didn't use it all because I haven't built the key shaping or sidetone circuitry. More about this later. It worked well. Note that Wes has posted an <a href="http://http://w7zoi.net/mark2.pdf" target="_blank">errata</a> document on his web site with some important modifications to the oscillator especially for 80 and 40 meters.</p> <p> Unfortunately the 2SC5739 transistor has been discontinued by Panasonic. A good substitute is the BD139. This was a suggestion from Wes in response to a question I posted on the <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emrfd" target="_blank">EMRFD Yahoo Group</a> / mailing list. I can confirm that the BD139 works very well for both Q2 and Q3, at least on 80 meters, and seems to be in plentiful supply at <a href="http://mouser.com/ProductDetail/Fairchild-Semiconductor/BD13910STU/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMuDHCWHhuFg%252baPN204G4fBcJP6y0YB0YvU%3d" target="_blank">Mouser</a> for 30 cents. It's in a TO-126 plastic package so no insulation is required when it's mounted. The <a href="http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/philips/BD139-16.pdf" target="_blank">Philips data sheet</a> shows a typical f<sub>T</sub> of 190 MHz so it should be good for most of the HF spectrum. It seems like a perfect choice. Note that if you mount it in the usual way with the writing and orientation dot upwards, the BD139 pin connections are the reverse of the 2SC5759. With the wires pointing down, left to right, the BD139 is emitter, collector, base.</p> <p> Wes commented that bipolar switching transistors suitable for RF amplifiers seem to be slowly but surely disappearing from manufacturers' catalogs and being replaced by FETs. Let's hope the BD139 stays around for a while. I think a few suppliers such as and <a href="http://www.kitsandparts.com" target="_blank">Kits and Parts</a> still have some 2SC5739 and <a href="http://www.kangaus.com" target="_blank">Kanga</a> is still selling the bag of parts so I guess Bill has some too but I didn't feel comfortable building something new and experimenting with (and potentially destroying) a device that is no longer being made.</p> <p> Replacing the crystal oscillator with the DDS is very simple. I've thrown away the oscillator and T1, i.e, everything to the left of point X on the schematic and simply connected the DDS output to point X at the top of the R17 trimpot. My R17 is 500 ohm and I seem to have lost the recommended 270 ohm resistor in parallel but it works well. The output level trimpot on the DDS-60 is set to a resistance of about 100 ohms. This gives an output of about 3 v p-p which is enough to comfortably drive the transmitter. R17 adjusts the power output smoothly up and down. The final result is a nice simple, proven circuit with no tuned circuits to adjust.</p> <p> The BD139 final is bolted to the PC board with no heatsink. It gets a little hot if I key down for a while but it seems to stay at a reasonable temperature during normal CW contacts. A small heatsink would probably be a good idea.</p> <p> My operation is rather simplistic at this point. I wanted to prove the RF side of it first so I only have the circuitry for Q2 (driver) and Q3 (final) and Q4 (keying) but that's enough for me to operate quite easily. I use my Kenwood TS430S for receiving. The T/R relay is a double pole double throw as in Wes' design but I use both parts of it for antenna switching. The other half of the relay is wired so that the receiver input is grounded on transmit. It didn't want any risk of blowing up the front end of the TS430S. A front panel toggle switch acts as a T/R switch by switching power to the transmitter and relay on and off. It's not quite as convenient as semi or full break-in keying but I find it easy to use for casual QSOs. When on receive I hit button 2 on the DDS to put it in Quiet mode so that I don't hear it in my receiver. I didn't build the sidetone generator either. On transmit I simply listen to my own signal on the receiver. With the antenna input grounded, its just a good strong signal. I hear some backwave between dits and dahs but I don't find it a problem.</p> <p> If I crank up the R17 drive control, I can get the power output up to just over 6 watts into a 50 ohm dummy load. I leave it at about 4 watts. I measure the power with an oscilloscope setting it to about 40 v p-p which is about 4 watts. This corresponds quite closely to Wes' observed 9.4 volts DC on the diode rectifier / RF probe at the output so that gives me some confidence that my newly acquired second hand oscilloscope is reasonably accurate.</p> <p> It's built very roughly and was mostly intended as a proof of concept but it's fun to operate and I've made quite a few contacts. My next project is to build another one nicely in the same sort of metal box as the DDS. I think I'll try 40 meters this time. I will do something to enable semi break-in keying. I'll eventually have to do something about sidetone because my next project after that might be a matching direct conversion receiver. I'm not sure if I'll do the sidetone with an oscillator like the original design or try to get the Arduino in the DDS to produce sidetone.</p> <p> The RF circuitry is so simple with only two transistors that it should be reasonably easy to duplicate it several times in one box to make a multiband transmitter. Lots of possibilities. <img alt=":)" src="http://www.theladderline.com/sites/all/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/regular_smile.gif" title=":)" /></p> <p> 73<br /> Ross</p> </div> <span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"><span lang="" about="/user/3" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Ross</span></span> <span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden">Sun, 04/11/2010 - 15:55</span> <section class="field field--name-comment field--type-comment field--label-hidden comment-wrapper"> <article role="article" data-comment-user-id="0" id="comment-88" about="/comment/88" typeof="schema:Comment" class="comment js-comment by-anonymous clearfix"> <span class="hidden" data-comment-timestamp="1288984147"></span> <footer class="comment__meta"> <article typeof="schema:Person" about="/user/0" class="profile"> </article> <p class="comment__author"><span rel="schema:author"><span lang="" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Anonymous (not verified)</span></span> </p> <p class="comment__time">Fri, 11/05/2010 - 16:09 <span property="schema:dateCreated" content="2010-11-05T19:09:07+00:00" class="rdf-meta hidden"></span> </p> <p class="comment__permalink"><a href="/comment/88#comment-88" hreflang="en">Permalink</a></p> </footer> <div class="comment__content"> <h3 property="schema:name" datatype=""><a href="/comment/88#comment-88" class="permalink" rel="bookmark" hreflang="en">40 Meter CW Xmitter Project</a></h3> <div property="schema:text" class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-comment-body field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field__item"><p>Ross :</p> <p>This is a great write-up of your project. Very informative.<br /> I had begun to investigate these same areas, using the DDS-60 etc.<br /> Your site is very informative and helpful.</p> <p>Thanks much for your efforts.</p> <p>Dick, N4UN</p> </div> <drupal-render-placeholder callback="comment.lazy_builders:renderLinks" arguments="0=88&amp;1=default&amp;2=en&amp;3=" token="yNROpDxHetycA7X96bZ0aaei_TH6OlLk12xsiZxQxwI"></drupal-render-placeholder> </div> </article> </section> <div class="field field--name-tags1 field--type-entity-reference field--label-above"> <div class="field__label">Tags</div> <div class="field__items"> <div class="field__item"><a href="/taxonomy/term/5" hreflang="en">CW</a></div> <div class="field__item"><a href="/taxonomy/term/4" hreflang="en">QRP</a></div> </div> </div> Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:55:25 +0000 Ross 20 at https://www.theladderline.com https://www.theladderline.com/node/20#comments Having fun with QRSS https://www.theladderline.com/node/19 <span class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden">Having fun with QRSS</span> <div class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p>I've been having fun with QRSS over the last few weeks. My <a href="/dds-60">Arduino controlled DDS-60</a> has been transmitting "barefoot". i.e, connected directly to an antenna tuner which goes to a balun which feeds the ladder line out to my antenna. It's been running for long periods sending very slow CW using frequency shift keying with about 6 Hz shift.</p> <p> I'm not sure exactly how much power I'm putting out but I think it's about 15 milliwatts. I adjust my antenna tuner for zero reflected power using my Kenwood TS430S transceiver and then connect the DDS-60 instead. I measure the DDS-60 output with an oscilliscope and assume the tuner is presenting an impedance of 50 ohms.</p> <p> I've been received or "spotted" once in New Zealand and frequently in UK, Belgium and Italy. This is near 10.140 MHz in the 30m band.</p> <p> QRSS is a fascinating mode with a community of friendly and interesting people. Claudio,  I2NDT runs a <a href="http://digilander.libero.it/i2ndt/grabber/grabber-compendium.htm">web site</a> that shows various receivers or "grabbers" around the world. Scott Harden AJ4VD is doing some great work developing improved <a href="http://www.swharden.com/blog/qrss_vd">grabber software</a>.</p> <p> There is another mode somewhat similar to QRSS which is called WSPR (Weak Signal Propagation Reporter) or "whisper" as it's pronounced. WSPR was invented by Joe Taylor, K1JT. In many ways, WSPR is more sophisticated and automated than QRSS. The software forms a complete system when connected to an SSB transceiver via an audio interface. It will send and receive and, if connected to the internet, it will send reports automatically to the <a href="http://wsprnet.org/drupal/">central web site</a>.  The web site has a very <a href="http://wsprnet.org/drupal/wsprnet/map">cool map</a> showing recent activity.</p> <p> I have considered the possibility of adding a WSPR mode to the Arduino DDS-60 <a href="/node/10">code</a>. As I understand it, a WSPR signal is FSK with four frequencies so the RF side of it should be achievable. The difficult part is that it needs to know the time of day or at least when time of day minutes begin within about a second. I don't see any way of doing that with the RBBB Arduino board which uses a ceramic resonator for timing.</p> <p> When the standard WSPR software runs on a PC it uses the system time which is usually synchronized with an internet time server. I think some people have built WSPR hardware that uses a GPS receiver as a time standard.</p> <p> I have pondered upon the idea of building another microcontroller / DDS-60 device to be controlled from a PC. The Arduino or PIC or whatever would simply act as a communication "bridge" between USB and the DDS-60. Software on the PC could generate WSPR signals using an internet time server. That would eliminate the need for an SSB transmitter and would make a nice small WSPR beacon. That wouldn't cover receiving and I think to be a "good citizen" of the WSPR community you really should act as a receiver as well as a transmitter. Even with QRSS I felt a bit guilty because I was only transmitting. On WSPR you certainly shouldn't transmit 100% of the time but even with an appropriate transmit / receive ratio, I think Joe's intention is that you should be receiving and reporting during your key up times. I need to give this some more thought and investigation but it's probably not something I'll get into any time soon.</p> <p> By the way, Joe Taylor is a Nobel Prize winning physicist.  His <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1993/taylor-autobio.html">biography</a> on the Nobel Prize web site mentions ham radio and is interesting reading.</p> <p> 73<br /> Ross</p> </div> <span class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden"><span lang="" about="/user/3" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Ross</span></span> <span class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden">Sat, 04/10/2010 - 22:49</span> <section class="field field--name-comment field--type-comment field--label-hidden comment-wrapper"> </section> <div class="field field--name-tags1 field--type-entity-reference field--label-above"> <div class="field__label">Tags</div> <div class="field__items"> <div class="field__item"><a href="/taxonomy/term/4" hreflang="en">QRP</a></div> <div class="field__item"><a href="/taxonomy/term/3" hreflang="en">QRSS</a></div> </div> </div> Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:49:24 +0000 Ross 19 at https://www.theladderline.com https://www.theladderline.com/node/19#comments